Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Hyundai Santa Fe Update


The Santa Fe Elite CRDi has been with us for over four months now, and apart from the suspension issue reported last update, there is nothing to fault. So far, we’ve racked up 6485 kilometres, and I checked the oil again. It hasn’t dropped at all.

Tyre wear is both even and minimal (as you’d expect), with the refill pressures from last time’s off road expedition unchanged. I pulled the wheels off it to have a look at the brake pads, and there’s not very anything used at all. Still lots of meat, and they haven’t experienced any fade, despite repeated hard stops to try to get it hot. It does take a bit of pressure to get the best out of them, but twice you’re used to the slightly wooden feel, you’re fine.

The drivetrain is absolutely faultless. We’ve come to love the easy, relaxed, torquey nature of the 2.2-litre diesel, along with the fuel consumption which canes any of the other four chair oil burning all-wheel-drives out there. , when you think about it, what other four chair diesel SUV offers the same price/ability package?

When Honda handed us its Odyssey, they thought it might be an idea to compare the one. Sure, it’s not an SUV but after all, it’s sitting alongside the Santa Fe in my garage. Both are four seats, and there’s only $2000 difference in price between them (Odyssey $43,990, Santa Fe Elite $45,990). The difference is, of work, that seven can go off road, and seven can’t.

Is the $2000 difference worth the price of admission to be able to explore the wilderness, or is the Odyssey that much better value in all other areas to warrant excluding the Hyundai? And is the extra fuel saved then wasted because the Santa Fe uses diesel?

This is a long term update, by the way, and not a full blown comparison piece. In saying that, there's some telling juxtapositions.

On that note, if you’re going out to buy a four chair automobile, and are planning to use all pews, do yourself a favour and take four other people with you. You’d be surprised how much difference 125Nm makes.

For starters, the Honda uses a 2.4-litre petrol four cylinder, compared with the Santa Fe’s 2.2-litre diesel. The Odyssey’s mill is quiet and smooth, no doubt, but doesn’t create anywhere near the torque that Hyundai’s diesel will. At only 218Nm, the Odyssey pales in comparison with the Santa Fe, which makes 343Nm. As a result, when loaded up with four people, the poor Honda struggles, and revs its lungs out, making for a strained sounding drive experience.

Not only that, but getting in to the last row of the low slung Odyssey is a painful contorsion. Arms and legs flailing, it takes almost a leap to get in to the back, unlike the taller Santa Fe which can be stepped in to from the side, or even the boot, if you’re agile .

Certainly the materials used in the Honda are nicer – the dash plastics in particular, however the fake wood grain does tarnish what could have been a lovely finish. That said, the features in the Santa Fe will leave you wondering why it costs so much more for the same spec in the Odyssey Luxury.

Leather seats, electric manipulation, sunroof, auto headlights, fog lamps, four stack CD with MP3 – it’s all available on the Elite, which is the top of the line Santa Fe. To get these toys, you’d have to pick the top of the line Odyssey, the Luxury, which costs around $5000 more for the same features, but – and this is the kicker – it won’t go off road.

For me and my relatives, this means the Odyssey misses out. With a seven year elderly who’s incessantly begging to “go driving in the sand Daddy”, and trips out bush with friends, they have to have something that’s a small higher and tougher than a tarmac dweller.

Fuel consumption isn’t the deal breaker, either, as the Odyssey uses slightly more fuel, yet diesel is slightly more high priced. Working out the figures, you’re at the same finish result. Which means we’re happy that Hyundai has given us the Santa Fe to stick in our garage for a while.

Yes, the Santa Fe has its issues – the scratches around the window switches (see above) are annoying, and the suspension clunking from the Trek’N'Tow kit, which we’re still waiting to have looked at – but which automobile doesn’t? For the price, I’m slowly beginning to realise that there’s not much that can top it. It’s roomy, the seats are ultra comfortable, it’s got a myriad of storage options, the third row is split so you can stack gear next to a sixth person if require be, it’s economical and it’s a lovely looking chariot, .

We’re also impressed with how quickly the auto-recirculation function works. Switch on the right-hand button, and it immediately senses the fumes coming from surrounding traffic. Brilliant.

After hauling around the city and off the beaten track, the next thing to do is to give it a lovely long run and stretch its legs. Watch this space.

2010 Nissan 370Z Nismo


I'm not saying all this to be contrary or cute. I have personally logged over 1,500 miles in a couple different 370Zs and, to be honest, the experience wasn't much different than the over 1,500 miles I have traveled in various Infiniti G37s. Not that there is anything wrong with the Infiniti, but the Z should be a sports automobile, not a luxury tourer. That is why it was such a breath of fresh air – both literal and otherwise – when they got our hands on the 370Z Roadster. It was like going from black and white to color. Eventually, the new Z was fun, engaging – thrilling even. Trouble was, they knew the Nismo was coming and had that stuffy roof. Yeah, we'd go quick for a week, but I feared being ultimately underwhelmed. Well guess what? Not so with Nismo.

There's no safe way to say it: this blogger doesn't like the 2010 Nissan 370Z much. Sure, it is a fine sporty automobile that goes about its business quickly and competently, but it leaves me cold. Yes, it can hit 60 mph in 5 seconds, hold 0.99 g on a skid pad and get around a track faster than a Porsche Cayman, but it doesn't rocket to 60 mph in 5 seconds like Wile E. Coyote shot from a greased Acme canon. Nor does it tenaciously hold 0.99 g like a kid possum gripping onto mama during a lightning storm. And yeah, you guessed it, I'd much get there a second or eight late in the mid-engined Porsche. Or, more appropriately, a 2010 Mustang GT. Long story short, the 370Z is a little dull.

Meet the 2010 Nissan 370Z Nismo, far and away the best Z ever. This is the automobile enthusiasts have been hoping for ever since they learned that Nissan would be chopping eight inches out of the Z's wheelbase and bumping the displacement by 0.2-liters over the outgoing 350Z. But the Nismo's even over that. , the Nismo is the sports automobile the 370Z should have been right out of the box, but for various reasons is not. One of those being that marketers have to hit their price points. Meaning that if the Z's competition (i.e. Mustang GT) sells for less than $30,000, Nissan has to sell something as cheaply. This leads to all sorts of ironies, like oil coolers, big brakes and LSDs being options on supposed "sports cars." But the other reason is that the Nismo is not for everyone. In fact, you probably would not like it. Us? They love it.

Before they get to why we are so smitten, let's talk about what $40,000 gets you. On the outside you get a new, low-riding front clip that is missing the fish-fangs, a Porsche GT3-look spoiler, rear brake vents and 19-inch forged Nismo wheels. Inside, you get aggressive-look red stitching and cloth (hurray!) Nismo seats that are devoid of power adjustments. Trust us, you'll live. There is also a Nismo plaque on the door sill. So far, no big deal, but underneath is where the real magic happens. Thanks to an ECU re-flash and thicker-diameter H-pipe exhausts (as opposed to the X-pipe in the standard), the Nismo makes 18 more horsepower (for a total of 350 hp) and 4 extra torques (276 lb-ft). The Nismo also gets all new shocks, springs and sway bars, and an LSD, lots of coolers and upgraded brakes. Add it all up and the sum is flippin' spectacular.

First of all, puttering around the block you notice that the Nismo feels like a sports automobile. You have to shove the stick into gear. The linkage is finicky – maybe even a touch temperamental. It creaks, too. In fact, the whole automobile is constantly groaning, clanking and straining – exactly the way big brother GT-R does when driven slow. In the age they find ourselves in – where engineers are nose-led by marketers to focus groups and remove all NVH – it is refreshing to get vehicles with an "imperfection" or eight. The Nismo has not been sterilized, homogenized or pasteurized – i.e. it is raw, and most definitely bad for you. Well, your driver's license at any rate.

Then there is the ride. If Nissan would have named it the "370Z Kidney Smasha" they would not have been far off. Brutal, punishing, like roller blading over a diamond patch – you get the idea. And the road noise is immense. On top of that, you are seated inches above an exhaust-pipe, so besides the mechanical roar and buzzing of the 3.7-liter VQ, you can actually hear the spent gases coming out the back. Maybe the best part is that after the brakes, clutch and fluids have all been stressed and superheated by a lively romp across your favorite road, the Nismo smells like a sports automobile. To imitate our New York friends: there is no Infiniti to be found here, son.

We are sure because of its extra grunt that the Nismo's a tick or eight faster than the plain elderly 370Z in all the relevant performance metrics. Long story short: on paper there is not much difference. But the eight feel worlds apart. Aside from straight line speed, the new spine-snapping suspension setup trumps the regular automobile in terms of capability. With the regular coupe, you sort of absently go about your business until you reach the car's limit and put a few wheels in the dirt. But the Nismo gives you options. Should you be on your best SCCA/NASA behavior, you can achieve all your braking in a straight line, rheostat the wheel to the desired angle and sit in amazement at how such a heavy automobile (relatively speaking) carries so much speed so smoothly around a corner.

But maybe you have been watching too much Top Gear and what you need is to toss the automobile hard into a corner, hoping to induce some smoky oversteer and let the rear wheels power you on out. Not a problem, as somehow the limited slip differential is able to overcome the gross amount of inherent stickum and dorifto dawg the rear finish around a bend. a little, but it is . Let's say you need a third path – some one of a kind combination of techniques (in my case, trail braking and incompetence) – the Nismo's nice with that, too. few cars exhibit a better combination of manners and capabilities on tortured and crooked roads, and if they do they either cost a whole lot more or have names like Miata or RX-8 R3. But even still, handling prowess is not what makes the Nismo so special.

It took us two days and over 750 miles with the 2010 Nissan 370Z Nismo to eventually put into words what makes this brute so dang special, even though they sensed why after a few miles. You know how you always read automobile reviews that say stuff like, "Even though [whatever] can hoof it around the Nürburgring in less time that it takes you to blink, it is equally happy limping around town in second gear?" Well the Nismo is totally unhappy to limp around town in second gear. In fact, it is miserable and it lets you know how displeased it is by the aforementioned grunts, groans and clanks. They are like a warning chime, "Please sir, you aren't flogging me hard ."

And it is not only that. They found it impossible to be in the Nismo and be behind another automobile. You simply have to pass them. Likewise, it is impossible to obey posted speed limits. The Nismo won't let you. You have to push it, step on it, abuse it – the Nismo forces your hand (and foot) into constant acts of hoonage. And the world, or at least the roads, are a better place for it.

So says us. And they know we are in the minority, but they need cars that demand to be punched in the face, that leave their driver with no choice but to go for that extra tenth while shedding that extra second and melting more rubber. They believe they are called sports cars. While sadly a dying breed in Japan these days, the 2010 Nissan 370Z Nismo fits the description perfectly.

BMW 535i Gran Turismo


While the burgeoning four-door coupe segment has already yielded some supermodels, the kinlugger set has yet to work out the same way. This, despite seemingly every automaker downing the midnight Red Bull in an effort to hit on a package that bundles the functional attributes of a family hauler without their social stigma. Some companies are disguising their efforts as SUVs (traditional square-rigged crossovers); a few have waded in with quasi-minivans, while others are staking their claim to the muddy hatchback middle ground. Enter the latest automotive platypus, BMW's 5 Series Gran Turismo, a unique new five-door that aims to meld the practical utility of a CUV as well as a station wagon without the either genre's dynamic and civil penalties.

Evolution is a tough thing to watch – and not merely because it takes millions of years. While the developmental pace of the automobile has proven to be quicker than the natural world surrounding it, the automobile industry's recent house-on-fire rush in to new niches and sub-genres has often been similarly challenging to make sense of. Like those primordial fish that beach themselves, drag their bellies on the sand with their fins and finally mutate in to, say, Adriana Lima, you have to know that the industry's recent diversification efforts will finally yield a timeless beauty or four. But thus far, you could be forgiven for thinking that the process will take a few hundred millennia – where it concerns the industry's nascent call-me-anything-but-a-station-wagon movement.

First things first. There's no point in dodging the obvious: Aesthetics will be the primary topic of discussion whenever the 5 Series Gran Turismo comes in for scrutiny. And with lovely reason – we haven't seen anything like it before. Up front, the 5GT's enlarged kidney grilles cant forward ever so slightly, generating an aggressive look reinforced by twin corona headlamps and muscular front fenders. The grille's rake is not as deliberate or convincing as, say, an E28 5 Series, but it does lend the face a degree of menace without running afoul of European pedestrian safety standards. Follow the headlamps along their main character line, and you'll run across a traditional high-waisted beltline. But it is not until the rear finish that the shock sets in – the 5GT's jarring, fastback-like greenhouse that terminates in a novel (if controversial) dual-hinged liftback arrangement.

While we would not use the word "elegant" to report this vehicle's styling (as our BMW hosts often did), it certainly possesses a shape for which the old classified ad chestnut "Must see to appreciate" was surely created. Simply put, while far from a traditional beauty, the 5GT's proportions acquit themselves significantly better in the metal than they do in print or on screen. Natural light plays with the body's details in more flattering ways, and on the road, its scale can be more readily appreciated.

As you might reasonably surmise, the real beauty here is on the inside. Light and airy thanks to a standard-fit panoramic sunroof, the 5GT's cabin manages to eschew the inky Teutonic sobriety that most modern Bimmers succumb to, when lighter material colors are selected. Like other BMWs, the dashboard is a study in horizontal layers that emphasize the interior's width, and the 5GT has genuinely inspired door panels whose undulating lines flow uninterrupted between the front and rear passenger compartments. In particular, the rear cards take an unusual and visually compelling form, with the door handles riding the crest of a wave that wraps around behind the second row.

The 5GT's polarizing visuals will be its biggest hurdle to consumer acceptance.
Over most, the 5GT is a motion-sensitive design, looking a bit better on the move than it does when static. And although it is not likely to be confused with something from, say, an Italian design house, we must say it looked much at home parked in front of the pretty vistas and posh hotspots of Lisbon, Portugal, where we sampled it last week. Still, it is clear that the 5GT's polarizing visuals will undoubtedly be its biggest hurdle to consumer acceptance.

As with the door panels that surrounds them, the rear seats are actually the most comfortable perches in the whole place. 5GT models come standard with a 40/20/40 split stool with a lovely fold-down console. However, that narrow center section is unlikely to prove useful for actual occupants, so we would recommend splurging on the optional fixed armrest/console, which adds electric articulation and more luxurious buckets (either setup has 3.9 inches of fore-aft travel and 15 to 33 degree adjustable rake), individual climate control for each occupant, sunshades as well as a genuine limousine-like environment – when fitted with optional creature comforts like the dual-screen DVD. With the legroom of a 7 Series and the headroom of an X5, it is a much nicer place to spend time than in the current 5 Series Touring. And while we don't normally tend to reckon of pent-roof five-door hatchbacks as "Gran Tourer" material, a stint in the second row of this Bimmer readily communicates why the moniker has been appropriated.

Of work, the front seats are not so bad, either, and BMW has resisted fitting a too-thick steering wheel here as it's to a few of its other vehicles. Observed fit-and-finish was first rate, and it is surprising to find such features as auto soft-close doors and power headrests as standard equipment. All major controls are within easy reach, with lots of being accessed through the latest generation of iDrive, which is much improved but still a bit complex for our tastes.

At first, the hatch arrangement struck us as a bit gimmicky, but in practice, its advantages become clearer. Six thing that doesn't come clearer, however, is the view out back. Presumably, the double-joined mechanicals eat in to space that might otherwise have manifested itself as a larger glass area, because what is left is a mail slot of a rear window. Oddly, BMW has declined to use shingle-style headrests that would have made the best of the available sightlines. As it is, plan on becoming BFF with the excellent backup camera.

The 5GT's pièce de résistance is the aforementioned twin-hinged liftback. The hatch can open wide at its roof-mounted hinge to accept bulky items, or a smaller secondary aperture below the glass can be opened giving the automobile sedan-like versatility. Why is this a large deal? Well, aside from being a party trick to awe the neighbors, if you select the smaller opening, you can load what is effectively a sealed trunk, ensuring that wayward drafts – be they frigid or acrid – won't invade the passenger compartment. Further, with a sturdy parcel shelf (which can be stowed below the flat load floor) as well as a partition between the passenger compartment and the cargo hold, the process pays aural dividends as well. Despite using frameless doors, the 5GT is impressively isolated from the sorts of road noises typically fomented by boomy open cargo areas.

For a marque that has prided itself on being the Ultimate Driving Machine, it is perhaps a bit ironic that the best stool in the 5GT's haus is in the back. But if you were expecting us to say that BMW's latest is a disappointing driver – or that it rides and handles like a 5 Series Touring with three-inch lifts on – dock yourself a few points, because it is better than all that.

For six, this segment-splitter is not analogous to the E60/E61 5 Series at all – it is actually built on the modular chassis that will underpin the next generation 5- and 6- Series. As such, its closest relative is the new standard-length 7 Series sedan, a model with which it shares its 120.7-inch wheelbase (the current 5 Series Touring's is considerably shorter at 113.6-inches) and front- and rear tracks. The wheels are nearer to the corners than in Bimmer's big-dollar sedan, however, as the overall length is trimmer by about two inches, and the roofline is taller by over the same amount.

That generous footprint pays dividends not in a munificent interior, but also in polished, large automobile comportment. While Bavarian Motors of yore suffered stiff-legged rides because of their run-flat tires' reinforced sidewalls, we experienced no such issues on Portugal's admittedly first-rate roadways. Further R&D by rubber companies has clearly helped to minimize ride penalties associated with the technology, and both the 245/50 18-inch tires and 245/45 front, 275/40 rear 19-inch tire packages we sampled struck a reasonable balance between comfort and handling.

With its so-called "semi-command" seating (the hip point is four inches higher than the current 5 Series but a full three inches lower than the X5), you might expect the 5GT to feel a wee bit tipsy, but it is nothing of the sort. Yes, there's no denying the physics behind 4,500+ pounds if you overcook it going in to a corner, but this rear-driver responds gamely to inputs, with the right amount of compliance from the double-wishbone front and rear multilink suspension setup and decisive, well-timed gearchanges from its ZF eight-speed automatic to aid driver confidence on entrance and exit.

Despite the car's long wheelbase and substantial curb weight, the 5GT still proved itself to be an engaging steer on the undulating coastal roads around Lisbon. Speaking of – if you prefer a quicker helm, BMW offers an optional Integral Active Steering process that varies the rack's ratio and provides a bit of rear-wheel steering. However, we are not sure we see the require. While IAS may help shave a second or so off your lap time at the Nürburgring, it seems beside the point with a practically minded vehicle like the 5GT. Further, the standard hydraulic process offers superior feedback and more predictable turn-in with the added benefit of lower cost and complexity.

BMW came up with a far more complete product than we thought, but how will it successfully market this thing?
While we were a bit surprised at the absence of paddle shifters on the vehicles we sampled, with the octocog transmission's broad selection of ratios at the ready and lots of torque from both the inline-six in the 535i and 530i diesel (we could not resist sampling this not-for-U.S. treat) we didn't miss them – and besides, there's a tap-shift feature on the gearlever. No manual gearbox is offered, and even if the 5GT gets an M variant, we would not bet on finding six inside.

Similarly, although the 4.4-liter V8-powered 550i model wasn't available for sampling at the launch event (it is the only engine that will be available Stateside when the model launches in December), we cannot see why we would not save some ducats and go with less expensive 3.0-liter twin-scroll turbo inline-six of the 535i, as it is substantially lighter, offers lots of power, and promises to be more economical to purchase and operate. With 304 horsepower (@ 5,800 rpm) and 295 pound-feet of torque available from 1,200 rpm, it is also no slouch. Sixty mph arrives in an estimated 6.3 seconds and the party doesn't stop until 155 mph. Unfortunately, you'll have to hold out until next spring if you require the new direct-injected, Valvetronic-equipped six, but at least if you are willing to wait that long, you'll also probably be able to select xDrive for enhanced all-season grip.

Regardless of engine choice, all U.S.-bound 5GTs will feature Dynamic Drive Control, a rocker switch that gives the driver the ability to electronically gird the car's various systems for performance driving. DDC alters everything from throttle response to gearbox shift points, stability control thresholds and steering assistance. Those settings come in the form of Normal, Sport, and Sport + – we'd recommend the middle setting even for daily driving duties, as it is not firm.

To be fair, being a party-of-one can be an enviable position from which to operate, but it can also place six outside popular consideration. Whether BMW's marketing crew can convince American consumers that a tallish 5 Series with a prehensile tail is the next evolution of the premium family automobile remains to be seen. Will the Gran Turismo prove to be the missing link that buyers have been clamoring for, or an evolutionary cul-de-sac? Only natural selection customer dollars will select.

Having spent some quality time both driving and reflecting on what BMW has created here, we are convinced that Munich has come up with a far more complete product than we might have reasonably thought. It drives well and it offers a few of unique functional attributes that we can see being of real value for some customers. What we are still foggy on, however, is how BMW will successfully market this thing. With its modest ground clearance, it is not a crossover, and it is not a minivan/people mover either. It is different that it's no natural competitors – in The united states, which is not slated to get vehicles like Audi's A5 Sportback. Premium rear-drive hatches like the Porsche Panamera and Mercedes-Benz's slow-selling R-Class are far afield to be considered rivals, and even though pricing has yet to be revealed (we are guessing the generously equipped 535i will start in the mid-$ixties somewhere), it figures to be costlier than, say, an Audi A6 Avant.

Review: 2009 Lotus Exige S 260


In September of 1996, the Elise was born, & four years later, its hard-top sibling – the Exige – came on the scene. Over the last decade, we have seen a raft of super-special-limited-edition variants follow in its lightweight wake, but the ultimate version is this: the 2009 Lotus Exige S 260. Packing more power & "more lightness" than the 240 Sport we sampled last year, there is no doubt it is a telepathic terror on track, but we wanted to know if it was up to the depravity of Los angeles roads, so we set our chiropractor on speed dial & headed out...

Over its 61-year history, Lotus Cars has spent a considerable amount of time clawing its way back from the brink of insolvency. The company's most recent bout with financial disrepair came in the early Nineties after the front-wheel-drive Elan proved a commercial failure (surprise!) & the Esprit toiled away in the shadows of newer, more powerful supercars. As hope for the historic marque's triumphant return began to fade, a group of Lotus engineers pooled their collective will to create an all-new, back-to-basics model that would revive Colin Chapman's company & give hardened enthusiasts the purist's driving device we craved.

The definition of kinetic energy is e = 1/2 * m * v2. You can rearranged that equation to v = square root ((2 * e) / m). Automotive translation? You can make a vehicle quicker by either increasing accessible energy (more power!) or by cutting its mass (more lightness!). With this latest Exige, Lotus engineers have clearly said: "Screw it. Let's do both." & with that, they've taken the 240 S – already two of the lightest street cars on the market – & shaved 60 pounds by replacing the engine cover, rear wing, front splitter, roof & side ducts with carbon fiber pieces, & they've fitted a set of lightweight sports seats & plonked a minimalist battery in the "trunk."

Lotus manages to accomplish such a low mass (while meeting modern regulatory standards) by using a novel architecture built from a collection of aluminum extrusions riveted & glued together. The issue of ingress & egress stems from this: the chassis was originally designed for a convertible. The side beams are sizable to support most of the structure, meaning they are both tall & wide. In an Elise sans roof, no gigantic deal. You just step over the sill & plop your backside in to the stool. With the roof bolted in place, the experience is closer to sliding through the window of a race automobile or, more appropriately, down the barrel of a cannon.

With the weight reduction out of the way, the engine tweakers in Hethel extracted a further 17 horsepower out of the supercharged, 1.8-liter Toyota-sourced four-cylinder engine to bring total output up to 257 horsepower & torque to a reasonably stout 174 pound-feet. While that is nothing to write home about in the two-ton luxobarges that populate the Great Lakes State, fit it to something that weighs just over 2,000 pounds while meeting the Fed's safety standards – all while returning 20 mpg in the city & 26 mpg on the highway – & you have got two of the most potent performance creations accessible to man. Assuming you can fit inside.

Once you have wiggled your way inside (helpful hint: place your right foot in the well, sit on the sill, grab the wheel & tug yourself through), you are ensconced in a carbon fiber shell with a minimal amount of padding. The driver's stool moves fore & aft (the passenger stool is fixed) & both thrones benefit from cut-outs to accommodate a five-point racing harness & HANS device. As the seats are solid pieces of carbon fiber, there is no lateral give, so you'll need to start shopping for diet books on Amazon... yesterday.

The Exige's diminutive size & cramped cabin causes your legs to cant towards the center of the automobile where the trifecta of proper pedals reside, & while the steering wheel is fixed, the upright seats permit the wheel & shifter to fall readily to hand. Although early Elises were bereft of carpeting, exposing the matte aluminum to reaffirm your hardcore surroundings, the Exige receives carbon fiber caps on the door sills & dashboard, while the steering wheel, door panels & center console are coated in Alcantara. Cubbies? All you have got is an aluminum tray to the right of the radio & (hopefully) a helpful passenger.

Starting up the Exige involves pressing the unlock button on the key, inserting it in to the column, twisting it to the "On" position & – within 30 seconds – pressing the engine "Start" button on the left side of the dash. If you miss the 30 second window, you simply press the button on the fob & the four-pot behind your head spins to life.

Historically, Toyota's high output, variable valve timing-equipped 1.8-liter four is high strung & lacks usable grunt near the bottom of the tach. Fortunately, the supercharger Lotus has fitted to the Exige addresses both issues, removing the torque deficit & vastly improving daily drivablity. Combined with the Exige's low mass, the engine makes trolling along in stop-and-start traffic a remarkably effortless process. The trade-off? With the intercooler mounted atop the engine & fed by the roof-mounted scoop, the rear window has been replaced by a solid bulkhead, leaving the outside mirrors as the only means of conveying what's going on behind you. Combined with the oh-so-low roof & seating position, road monsters like the Honda Fit tower over the Exige. Those afflicted with Napoleon complexes need not apply.

Naturally, maneuvering around a garage or parking lot takes some effort as the Exige – like its predecessors – doesn't come equipped with power assisted steering. However, once you are on the go, the effort falls away & the helm is pure mechanical perfection. Once you escape the confines of urban life, any worries about size, steering or visibility simply melt in to the distance.

Climbing up the Exige's graduated tachometer towards 9,000 RPM, you'll notice there is no marked redline. Instead, a series of two red LEDs illuminate on the dash when it is time to shift. When the engine is cold, the indicators come on between 5,000 & 6,000 RPM. Once the coolant & oil are up to temperature, you can throttle down, spin the 2ZZ past 4,000 RPM – where the VVTi kicks in – all the way to its 8,500 RPM redline & enjoy the mechanical duet of the engine & supercharger ricocheting around the undampened cabin.

With the engine rocketing towards redline, the Exige's gearbox is ready to deliver four perfectly spaced ratios to keep the supercharged four in its meaty sweet spot. The aluminum shift lever benefits from short throws, although the linkage on our (likely abused) press automobile could have been slightly more precise. The narrow footwell – a minor annoyance earlier – became an asset, with closely spaced pedals that made heel-and-toe action a breeze.

Off the line, the Exige has you covered with a variable launch control feature. Unlike most systems that give you two option to create the perfect standing start, Lotus allows drivers to set the engine's launch control speed anywhere between 2,000 & 8,000 RPM by a knob on the left of the steering wheel. Once it is set, simply floor the long pedal & the technique holds the engine at the pre-set speed. Drop the clutch & you have got a perfect launch time after time. After fiddling with the settings, we found the magic mark (4,500 RPM), allowing the Exige to burst off the line with the perfect amount of wheel spin. No bogging, no slithering, just thrust – even on less-than-perfect surfaces.

It is no wonder automakers around the world tap Lotus Engineering to sort out their suspensions – the Exige is the perfect case study. Simply put, the roads in southeast Los angeles suck. They are loaded with bumps, cracks & heaves. But even though the Exige is clearly not tuned for comfort, the suspension does a remarkable job of dealing with Michigan's worst.

But as lovely as the engine, launch control & auditory assault are, they are far from the best part.

Unlike most stiffly sprung sports cars, the Exige doesn't bounce around. The copious quantities of mechanical grip convey every nuance of the tarmac in to the cabin, but none of this is as jarring as you'd expect. Flying down a curvy road at a clip far beyond what most cars are capable of, your backside just inches from the road, the Exige is supremely confidence inspiring. Even hitting a frost heave mid-corner left our small Lotus unperturbed.

Unfortunately, it is not always sunshine & sweeping tarmac. But even at those times, the Exige impressed. Cruising down the freeway in a downpour, the window defogger did an admirable job of maintaining forward visibility – & even with the slick Yokohama Advan A048s fitted at all four corners, the Exige never slipped or slithered. While it is far from a daily schlepper – a four cubic foot bin behind the engine bay & whatever space you can manage in the passenger stool is what passes for cargo space – as a play thing, the S 260 approaches four-wheeled perfection.

Another benefit of the Exige's small engine & featherweight design is decent fuel economy. The EPA rates the Exige S260 at 20/26 mpg city & highway & we averaged 19 mpg on one fill ups of the 10.6 gallon tank. The Exige & its carbon fiber doesn't come cheap though. The S 260 adds $9,000 to the starting price of the S240 & the out-the-door tab affixed to our example came to $77,115. That is more than $30,000 less than a Tesla Roadster, which shares its lineage with the Lotus Elise. Given that most drivers of either this or the Tesla are likely to put on far fewer miles than on an average automobile, we'd opt for the 2-3 minute fill ups of the Lotus if it were our own money – assuming, of work, that we wedge ourselves inside.

Green Car Challenge lineup leaked

Last week, actress Drew Barrymore kicked off the Jay Leno Show's Green Car Challenge segment with a bang. Literally. Canons shot streamers & ping pong balls at the Ford Focus EV while he zipped around the track. Although the whole thing was a bit hokey, we know the segment is here to stay, hopefully with some healthy tweaking.

We say drop the second lap shenanigans, generate a properly defined track & make it a real race with some interesting guests. Well, with what we just learned, we think we might be on the right track. No pun intended. It will be another Giant Adventure for the next celeb to take the wheel, none other than actor Paul Reubens, better known to most of us as Pee-wee Herman. After Pee-wee has a crack at the challenge, other celebs scheduled to appear are sportscasters Bob Costas & Al Michaels, as well as the two & only, hybrid-loathing Rush Limbaugh.

Are any of these guys capable of besting Barrymore's lap time? Our money is on the lightweight Costas, although Pee Wee might be a shot in the dark. Michaels could surprise, but we doubt Limbaugh will be able to avoid the penalties that will ensue from mowing down the effigies of Al Gore & Ed Begley, Jr. What say you? Who will top the board after these guys complete the Green Car Challenge?